Thailand: Worst Performer, -3.8% vs the SET Index

OCF momentum returned 1.4% annually on Thai stocks vs the SET Index's 5.1%, lagging by -3.8%, the worst of any market tested. Negative Sharpe (-0.06), -55.7% drawdown, 24% cash periods.

Growth of $10,000 invested in OCF Momentum Thailand vs SET Index

OCF momentum returned 1.4% annually on Thai stocks, 2000-2025, underperforming the SET Index by 3.8% per year. The SET returned 5.1% annually. $10,000 grew to $14,034 vs SET's $34,946, a total return of 40%. The strategy held cash in 6 of 25 years (24%) and suffered a -55.7% max drawdown when invested. Negative Sharpe (-0.06) and a win rate of just 40%. Thailand is the only market where the signal consistently fails vs the local benchmark. Cash drag and poor stock selection both hurt.

Contents

  1. What We Found
  2. Run It Yourself

Data: FMP financial data warehouse, 2000–2025. Updated June 2026.


What We Found

Growth of $10,000: Thailand $14K vs SET Index $34.9K
Growth of $10,000: Thailand $14K vs SET Index $34.9K

Metric Thailand (SET) SET Index
CAGR 1.4% 5.1%
Volatility 19.3% -
Max Drawdown -55.7% -35.6%
Sharpe -0.06 -
Cash Periods 6 of 25 0
Win Rate 40% -

The negative Sharpe and 24% cash drag tell the story: the strategy couldn't find enough qualifying stocks in most years, and when it did, they underperformed.

Annual returns: no pattern, just pain
Annual returns: no pattern, just pain

Best year: 2011 (+35.7%) post-flood recovery. Worst year: 2024 (-32.9%) during baht weakness. But 15 of 25 years showed underperformance.

Why it failed: Thai SET is dominated by conglomerates, family-controlled businesses, and state-linked enterprises. Cash flow quality doesn't matter when stock prices are driven by political connections, currency moves, and sentiment.

Part of a Series: US Results | India Results | Canada Results | Global Comparison


Run It Yourself

Screen Thai stocks with OCF momentum on Ceta Research

Market cap threshold: ฿10B (~$286M USD), ROE > 10%, operating margin > 5%, OCF growth > NI growth.


Takeaway: Thailand shows the limits of financial signals in frontier markets. When governance is weak and political/currency risk dominates, OCF divergence adds no value.

Data: Ceta Research, SET 2000-2025. Full methodology: backtests/METHODOLOGY.md


Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is educational content, not investment advice.