China P/E Compression: -0.68% CAGR, -8.32% vs SPY

P/E compression on Chinese stocks delivers -0.68% CAGR vs 7.64% SPY, the worst absolute performance among all tested markets. Negative Sharpe and -63.70% max drawdown show P/E dynamics differ fundamentally in Chinese markets.

Growth of ¥10,000 invested in P/E compression China vs S&P 500 from 2000 to 2025.

P/E compression on Chinese stocks delivers -0.68% CAGR, the worst absolute performance among all 21 tested markets. The strategy underperforms SPY by 8.32% annually with negative Sharpe ratio and -63.70% max drawdown. P/E dynamics differ fundamentally in Chinese markets: government policy, state ownership, and speculative trading make compressed multiples unreliable mean reversion signals.

Contents

  1. Method
  2. What We Found
  3. Why China Is the Worst
  4. Conclusion

Data: FMP financial data warehouse, 2000–2025. Updated March 2026.


Method

Universe: SHZ + SHH (Shanghai + Shenzhen), market cap > ¥10B Period: 2000-2025 (25 years) Benchmark: S&P 500 Total Return (SPY, USD)

Returns in CNY. Benchmark in USD.


What We Found

Growth of ¥10,000 invested in P/E compression China vs S&P 500.
Growth of ¥10,000 invested in P/E compression China vs S&P 500.

Metric China S&P 500
CAGR -0.68% 7.64%
Excess -8.32% -
Sharpe -0.083 0.322
MaxDD -63.70% -34.90%
Down-Cap 84.76% 100%
Avg Stocks 23.9 -
Cash 0/25 -

Negative absolute CAGR means $10,000 shrank to $9,834 over 25 years. Negative Sharpe ratio. Max drawdown of -63.70% is catastrophic. This strategy failed completely.


Why China Is the Worst

Policy-driven markets. Chinese stocks move on government policy, not fundamentals. P/E compression can persist for years if policy doesn't favor the sector.

State ownership. Many Chinese companies are state-owned enterprises with unclear governance. P/E compression often reflects genuine concern about capital allocation and shareholder treatment.

Speculative trading. Chinese retail investors drive massive volatility. P/E ratios swing based on momentum and speculation, not earnings expectations.

Earnings quality. Financial reporting in China is less reliable. A compressed P/E may reflect skepticism about reported earnings, not temporary undervaluation.


Conclusion

China's P/E compression strategy delivers -0.68% CAGR, the worst absolute return among all tested markets. Underperformance of 8.32% annually shows the signal doesn't work when policy, governance, and speculative trading dominate pricing. Mean reversion requires stable, predictable P/E dynamics. China doesn't provide that.


Data: Ceta Research. Returns in CNY. github.com/ceta-research/backtests