Margin Expansion Across 14 Exchanges: Where Operating Margins Predict Returns
We tested margin expansion across 14 exchanges against local benchmarks. Taiwan produced a +6.85% annual spread. India showed a -12.86% reverse signal. The US posted +1.34%. Expanding margins beat the local index in 9 of 14 markets. Full data for all 14 exchanges included.
We ran the same margin expansion backtest across 14 global exchanges. The question: do companies with improving operating margins outperform those with deteriorating margins? The answer depends entirely on which market you're looking at.
Contents
- Method
- The Results at a Glance
- Where Margin Expansion Works
- Taiwan: +6.85% spread
- Hong Kong: +4.06% spread
- Singapore: +3.83% spread
- Sweden: +3.10% spread
- Germany: +1.98% spread
- UK: +1.93% spread
- Where Margin Expansion Barely Registers
- US: +1.34% spread
- China: +1.27% spread
- Switzerland: +0.65% spread
- Brazil: +0.41% spread
- Korea: -0.05% spread (essentially flat)
- Where the Signal Reverses
- India: -12.86% spread (contracting wins)
- South Africa: -2.27% spread
- Canada: -0.86% spread
- What Drives the Cross-Market Differences
- 1. Market concentration vs diversification
- 2. Growth vs profitability valuation regimes
- 3. Speed of price discovery
- Stable Margins: The Hidden Performer
- Full Comparison Table
- Expanding Portfolio vs Local Benchmark
- Limitations
- Takeaway
Taiwan produced a +6.85% annual spread between expanding and contracting portfolios. India showed a -12.86% reverse signal where contracting margins outperformed. The US registered at +1.34%. This isn't a universal factor. It's a market-structure-dependent signal that works powerfully in some economies and fails in others.
The main finding: margin expansion carries the most information in concentrated, export-driven markets where margin trends reflect real competitive positioning. In diversified economies with multiple sectors and revenue sources, the signal dilutes or reverses. Against local benchmarks, the expanding portfolio beat its home index in 9 of 14 markets.
Data: FMP financial data warehouse, 2000–2025. Updated August 2026.
Method
Data source: Ceta Research (FMP financial data warehouse) Universe: 14 global exchanges, market cap thresholds in local currency, excluding Financial Services Period: 2000-2025 (23-25 annual periods depending on exchange data availability) Rebalancing: Annual (April 1), equal weight, 45-day filing lag Benchmark: Local index per exchange (TAIEX, Sensex, FTSE 100, DAX, Hang Seng, and so on). South Africa uses the S&P 500 because no local index data is available. Cash rule: Hold cash if fewer than 10 qualifying stocks
Signal definition: - Operating Profit Margin (OPM) = Operating Income / Revenue from annual income statements - Margin Expansion = Current FY OPM minus average of prior 3 FY OPMs - Expanding: > +1 percentage point - Stable: -1pp to +1pp - Contracting: < -1 percentage point
Transaction costs: size-tiered (0.1%/0.3%/0.5%), one-way. Returns in local currency per exchange. Full methodology: backtests/METHODOLOGY.md
The Results at a Glance
| Exchange | Exp CAGR | Con CAGR | Spread | Avg Exp Stocks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taiwan | 9.22% | 2.37% | +6.85% | 75 |
| Hong Kong | 3.96% | -0.10% | +4.06% | 130 |
| Singapore | 2.35% | -1.48% | +3.83% | 11 |
| Sweden | 5.46% | 2.36% | +3.10% | 32 |
| Germany | 7.60% | 5.62% | +1.98% | 108 |
| UK | 7.81% | 5.88% | +1.93% | 149 |
| US | 7.17% | 5.83% | +1.34% | 549 |
| China | 4.37% | 3.10% | +1.27% | 647 |
| Switzerland | 5.08% | 4.43% | +0.65% | 34 |
| Brazil | 11.39% | 10.98% | +0.41% | 34 |
| Korea | 3.42% | 3.47% | -0.05% | 50 |
| Canada | 5.83% | 6.69% | -0.86% | 82 |
| S. Africa | 6.94% | 9.21% | -2.27% | 8 |
| India | 3.44% | 16.30% | -12.86% | 100 |
Three groups emerge from this data. Markets where margin expansion works strongly (Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Sweden). Markets where the signal is positive but modest (Germany, UK, US, China, Switzerland, Brazil). And markets where contracting margins outperform or the signal is flat (Korea, Canada, South Africa, India).
Where Margin Expansion Works
Taiwan: +6.85% spread
Taiwan is the global standout. Expanding-margin stocks returned 9.22% CAGR while contracting-margin stocks returned 2.37% annually. The expanding portfolio beats the TAIEX by +3.37% with 0.64 beta and +5.10% alpha.
Why it works here: Taiwan's market is concentrated in semiconductors, electronics, and tech hardware. In these industries, margin trends directly map to competitive positioning. A company expanding margins is winning foundry contracts or scaling process nodes. A company contracting is losing customers. The signal carries real fundamental information.
The signal weakened post-2015, but the cumulative 24-year result remains the strongest globally. Full analysis: Taiwan margin expansion blog.
Hong Kong: +4.06% spread
Hong Kong produced the second-widest positive spread. Expanding margins returned 3.96% vs -0.10% for contracting. The expanding portfolio beats the Hang Seng index by +2.68%. The directional signal is clear: expanding margins separate winners from losers.
Hong Kong's result reflects its role as a listing venue for Chinese companies across multiple sectors. Margin trends help sort companies exposed to competitive Chinese domestic markets where operational efficiency matters.
Singapore: +3.83% spread
Singapore has the third-widest spread, but the spread comes from the contracting side collapsing. Contracting-margin stocks lost -1.48% annually while expanding returned just 2.35%, short of the STI's 2.65%. The universe is thin: 11 expanding stocks on average, with the expanding portfolio sitting in cash in 4 of 25 periods. The signal separates winners from losers here, but neither side kept pace with the index.
Sweden: +3.10% spread
Sweden produced a positive spread from a small universe (32 stocks in the expanding portfolio). At 5.46% CAGR for expanding vs 2.36% for contracting, the signal is clear. The expanding portfolio beats the OMX Stockholm 30 by +3.06%. The stable portfolio (12.24% CAGR) is the real winner in Sweden.
Germany: +1.98% spread
Germany shows a consistent positive signal. Expanding margins returned 7.60% vs 5.62% for contracting (108 stocks). The expanding portfolio beats the DAX by +3.09%, making this a meaningful local outperformance even though the spread is modest.
UK: +1.93% spread
The UK signal is moderate but consistent. The expanding portfolio averaged 149 stocks, making this one of the most diversified results in the study. The expanding portfolio returned 7.81% vs FTSE 100's 1.15%, though the FTSE 100 is a price-only index (no dividends). Full analysis: UK margin expansion blog.
Where Margin Expansion Barely Registers
US: +1.34% spread
The US shows a modest positive signal. Expanding margins returned 7.17% vs 5.83% for contracting (549 stocks). The stable portfolio (9.78% CAGR) beats both, and the expanding portfolio essentially matches the S&P 500 (7.33%). The US market is too diversified and too efficient for margin expansion alone to generate large separation. Price discovery happens fast. The real signal in the US is margin stability, not margin expansion.
China: +1.27% spread
China's signal is weak despite having the largest expanding-margin universe (647 stocks). Expanding returned 4.37% vs 3.10% for contracting. The expanding portfolio beats the SSE Composite by +1.86%. The A-share market's speculative dynamics, high retail participation, and policy-driven sector rotations dilute fundamental signals like margin trends.
Switzerland: +0.65% spread
Switzerland's spread is thin (5.08% vs 4.43%, 34 stocks). The stable portfolio (6.55% CAGR) beats expanding, similar to the US pattern. The expanding portfolio still beats the SMI by +3.00%, one of the larger local outperformances in the study. Margin stability appears more valuable than margin expansion in this market.
Brazil: +0.41% spread
Brazil's spread is thin (11.39% vs 10.98%, 34 stocks), with expanding, stable (11.02% CAGR), and contracting all clustered near 11%. The expanding portfolio beats the Bovespa by +2.81%. The small universe and commodity-heavy sector composition mean the signal exists but carries high concentration risk.
Korea: -0.05% spread (essentially flat)
Korea's result (3.42% vs 3.47%, 50 stocks) shows no meaningful signal, and both portfolios trail the KOSPI (4.53%). Korea's chaebol-dominated market structure means a few large conglomerates drive returns regardless of margin trends at the individual stock level.
Where the Signal Reverses
India: -12.86% spread (contracting wins)
India produced the most dramatic reversal in the study. Contracting-margin stocks returned 16.30% CAGR while expanding returned just 3.44%. This is a genuine reverse signal. Against the Sensex (11.49% CAGR), expanding margins trail by -8.05%.
Why? India's growth dynamic rewards companies in rapid revenue expansion phases, even when that expansion temporarily compresses margins. A company investing heavily in distribution, capacity, or market share will show contracting operating margins. But in India's fast-growing economy, that margin compression is an investment, not a problem. The market rewards the growth, not the margin.
The Indian market's valuation framework is different from developed markets. Investors price in future margin recovery once growth investments pay off. Companies with already-expanded margins are often seen as having peaked. The NSE-only universe averages 100 expanding stocks and 79 contracting.
South Africa: -2.27% spread
South Africa shows a meaningful reverse signal (6.94% expanding vs 9.21% contracting). The expanding portfolio also trails the S&P 500, the reference benchmark here since no local index data is available, by -0.39%. The thin universe (8 stocks) limits generalizability.
Canada: -0.86% spread
Canada shows a mild reverse signal (5.83% vs 6.69%). Canada's market is resource-heavy, and commodity companies often show "contracting" margins during periods of investment that precede strong production-driven returns. The stable portfolio (9.13% CAGR) beats both, and even the expanding portfolio beats the TSX Composite by +1.78%.
What Drives the Cross-Market Differences
Three structural factors explain why the signal varies so widely.
1. Market concentration vs diversification
The strongest positive signals appear in concentrated markets. Taiwan (semiconductors), Hong Kong (Chinese commercial exposure), and Sweden (industrials/tech) all have sector tilts where margin trends reflect competitive dynamics. The weakest signals appear in diversified markets (US, China) where margin trends in one sector get diluted by unrelated dynamics in others.
| Market Type | Examples | Avg Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Concentrated/export | Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Sweden | +4.5% |
| European mid-size | UK, Germany, Switzerland | +1.5% |
| Large diversified | US, China, Korea | +0.9% |
| Growth-driven | India, Brazil, Canada | -4.4% |
2. Growth vs profitability valuation regimes
Markets that primarily reward revenue growth, India most dramatically, show reverse signals. Markets that reward profitability and operational efficiency (Taiwan, Germany) show positive signals. The margin expansion screen implicitly selects for companies optimizing current profitability. In growth markets, those companies are often ex-growth.
This is a key insight: margin expansion isn't a neutral signal. It carries embedded assumptions about whether improving profitability or accelerating growth is more valued by local market participants.
3. Speed of price discovery
In the US, margin improvements are anticipated by analysts, priced into forward estimates, and reflected in stock prices before annual filings confirm them. The quarterly earnings cycle, analyst coverage depth, and options market activity all accelerate price discovery. By the time an annual rebalance captures the margin expansion, the return has already happened.
In Taiwan and Hong Kong, analyst coverage is thinner for mid-cap companies. Annual margin changes contain more novel information. The signal retains predictive power because the market hasn't fully priced it yet.
Stable Margins: The Hidden Performer
One pattern worth highlighting: stable margins (within +/-1pp of the 3-year average) often perform well relative to what you'd expect.
| Exchange | Stable CAGR | Relative to Expanding | Relative to Contracting |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 12.24% | +6.78% | +9.88% |
| US | 9.78% | +2.61% | +3.95% |
| Canada | 9.13% | +3.30% | +2.44% |
| India | 8.94% | +5.50% | -7.36% |
| UK | 7.76% | -0.05% | +1.88% |
Sweden's stable portfolio (12.24% CAGR) is the standout performer, beating both expanding (5.46%) and contracting (2.36%) by large margins. The US stable portfolio (9.78% CAGR) also beats both. Stable beat contracting in 11 of 14 markets; the exceptions are India, Korea, and South Africa. This suggests that the primary signal isn't "expansion is good" but rather "contraction is bad" and "stability is underrated." Companies maintaining margins, even without improvement, tend to be well-run businesses that avoid operational deterioration.
Full Comparison Table
| Exchange | Exp CAGR | Stable CAGR | Con CAGR | Spread | Avg Exp | Avg Stable | Avg Con |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taiwan | 9.22% | 4.01% | 2.37% | +6.85% | 75 | 44 | 59 |
| Hong Kong | 3.96% | 1.68% | -0.10% | +4.06% | 130 | 53 | 158 |
| Singapore | 2.35% | 3.01% | -1.48% | +3.83% | 11 | 5 | 13 |
| Sweden | 5.46% | 12.24% | 2.36% | +3.10% | 32 | 19 | 25 |
| Germany | 7.60% | 6.97% | 5.62% | +1.98% | 108 | 65 | 87 |
| UK | 7.81% | 7.76% | 5.88% | +1.93% | 149 | 91 | 116 |
| US | 7.17% | 9.78% | 5.83% | +1.34% | 549 | 264 | 406 |
| China | 4.37% | 5.41% | 3.10% | +1.27% | 647 | 318 | 789 |
| Switzerland | 5.08% | 6.55% | 4.43% | +0.65% | 34 | 26 | 28 |
| Brazil | 11.39% | 11.02% | 10.98% | +0.41% | 34 | 11 | 31 |
| Korea | 3.42% | 1.03% | 3.47% | -0.05% | 50 | 37 | 53 |
| Canada | 5.83% | 9.13% | 6.69% | -0.86% | 82 | 38 | 65 |
| S. Africa | 6.94% | 5.58% | 9.21% | -2.27% | 8 | 4 | 8 |
| India | 3.44% | 8.94% | 16.30% | -12.86% | 100 | 39 | 79 |
Expanding Portfolio vs Local Benchmark
The expanding portfolio beat its local benchmark in 9 of 14 markets:
| Exchange | Benchmark | Bench CAGR | Exp CAGR | Excess |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK | FTSE 100 | 1.15% | 7.81% | +6.66% |
| Taiwan | TAIEX | 5.85% | 9.22% | +3.37% |
| Germany | DAX | 4.51% | 7.60% | +3.09% |
| Sweden | OMX Stockholm 30 | 2.40% | 5.46% | +3.06% |
| Switzerland | SMI | 2.08% | 5.08% | +3.00% |
| Brazil | Bovespa | 8.58% | 11.39% | +2.81% |
| Hong Kong | Hang Seng | 1.28% | 3.96% | +2.68% |
| China | SSE Composite | 2.51% | 4.37% | +1.86% |
| Canada | TSX Composite | 4.05% | 5.83% | +1.78% |
| US | S&P 500 | 7.33% | 7.17% | -0.16% |
| Singapore | STI | 2.65% | 2.35% | -0.30% |
| S. Africa | S&P 500* | 7.33% | 6.94% | -0.39% |
| Korea | KOSPI | 4.53% | 3.42% | -1.11% |
| India | Sensex | 11.49% | 3.44% | -8.05% |
*South Africa has no local index data available; the S&P 500 is used as the reference benchmark.
Limitations
Local currency returns. All returns are denominated in local currency. A USD-based investor comparing Taiwan (TWD) and India (INR) would see different relative rankings after currency adjustment.
Benchmark choice. Each exchange is measured against its own local index (TAIEX, Sensex, FTSE 100, DAX, and so on). South Africa uses the S&P 500 because no local index data is available. Several local indices are price-only (the FTSE 100, for example), which flatters excess returns in those markets.
Annual rebalance. The strategy rebalances once per year in April. More frequent rebalancing might capture margin changes faster in markets with quarterly reporting. The annual cadence benefits markets like Taiwan where semi-annual or annual filings are the norm.
Signal definition sensitivity. The +/-1pp threshold for expansion/contraction is fixed across markets. A 1pp OPM change means different things for a 25%-margin US software company and a 5%-margin Taiwanese electronics manufacturer. Percentage-based thresholds might produce different results.
Survivorship bias. Delisted companies with contracting margins would make contracting portfolios look even worse. The bias generally strengthens the positive signal in markets where it exists, making the negative-signal markets (India, South Africa) more noteworthy.
Universe sizes vary. South Africa (8 expanding stocks), Singapore (11), and Sweden (32) have much thinner universes than the US (549) or China (647). Results from thinner universes carry more single-stock concentration risk.
Takeaway
Margin expansion is not a universal factor. It's a market-structure-dependent signal.
The strategy works best in concentrated, export-driven economies where margin trends carry genuine competitive information. Taiwan's +6.85% spread is the clearest example. It works moderately in European markets (UK, Germany, Switzerland) with diversified but not enormous universes. It barely registers in the deepest markets (US, China) where price discovery is fast and sector diversification dilutes the signal. And it reverses in high-growth economies (India) where the market rewards investment-driven margin compression.
For a global investor, the practical takeaway: margin expansion as a factor allocation makes sense in Asian and European mid-size markets. In the US and India, other signals carry more weight.
Full backtest code: github.com/ceta-research/backtests Run live screens: cetaresearch.com/data-explorer
Data: Ceta Research (FMP financial data warehouse). Returns in local currency per exchange. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is educational content, not investment advice.
